Ok

En poursuivant votre navigation sur ce site, vous acceptez l'utilisation de cookies. Ces derniers assurent le bon fonctionnement de nos services. En savoir plus.

art - Page 4

  • China and America: Two visions, one collaboration?

    28049896.JPG

    The US and China are already working together on the clean-energy project Sapphire Wind in Pakistan, where Beijing and Washington want Pakistan to grow its economy and undermine extremism. PHOTO: SAPPHIRE WIND

     

    By MARC GROSSMAN

    With Mr Donald Trump’s election, China and the United States could be on a collision course. The US President-elect promised during the campaign to label China a currency manipulator, instruct the US Trade Representative to bring cases against China in the World Trade Organisation and threaten 45 per cent tariffs if China does not renegotiate trade agreements with the US. Meanwhile, China pursues a military build-up in the South China Sea designed to diminish US influence in Asia.

    As Mr Trump addresses trade and the other issues on the US-China agenda as president and not candidate, he may find it useful to look for areas where the two countries could work together.

    One opportunity ready to be explored is the vision promoted by both Beijing and Washington of the need for more economic and infrastructure connections between East Asia, South and Central Asia, the Middle East and Europe.

    Two concepts are in play: China’s One Belt, One Road, or Obor initiative, a multibillion-dollar programme to build ports, railways, roads, power plants in and around 60 countries and the more modest, but still important, American New Silk Road initiative, or NSR.

    In July 2011, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton spoke in India about the benefits of linking Central Asian economies with those in South Asia, with Afghanistan and Pakistan in the centre. Increased regional economic connectivity, she argued, would promote sustainable economic growth, a crucial part of the effort to defeat extremism.

    In September, the US convened a NSR ministerial meeting in New York and China expressed enthusiasm for the project.

    Turkey hosted the Heart of Asia Conference in November 2011 and, supported by the US and China, the concept became a touchstone for regional cooperation.

    Obstacles then emerged. The Chinese said the name New Silk Road “belonged to China” and “Historic Trade Routes” would be a better name for the US initiative.

    In 2013, Chinese leaders responded with a Silk Road initiative of their own: One Belt, One Road consists of two main components — a land-based Silk Road Economic Belt and a sea-based Maritime Silk Road — which Chinese leaders believe will together change the geostrategic and geo-economic face of the region.

     

    BENEFITS FOR AFGHANISTAN AND PAKISTAN

    In August this year, Chinese President Xi Jinping announced that more than 100 countries and international organisations had committed to participate in Obor.

    According to Chinese press reports, Obor is supported by US$40 billion (S$56.7 billion) from China’s Silk Road infrastructure fund, US$100 billion in Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank pledges, and an initial US$50 billion commitment from the New Development Bank of the Brics countries — Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa — with a promise to increase that to US$100 billion.

    The US and Chinese projects are currently on separate trajectories. American officials maintain that they support Obor, though the US is rightly wary of projects that enhance China’s military capacity. And the US cannot match the dollars or yuan pledged or spent.

    That said, there are several strategic, regional and commercial benefits to additional US-China cooperation around the Obor and NSR initiatives.

    For example, the US-China Summit in Hangzhou in September highlighted Afghanistan as an “area of cooperation”.

    The two countries share an interest in an Afghan state in which Al Qaeda and Islamic State find no havens, drug exports shrink and private sector–based economic activity increases.

    A coordinated Obor-NSR effort to create what Afghan officials once called an “Asian Roundabout” to encourage a sustainable Afghan economy would promote these shared goals. The recent opening of a rail line from the eastern coast of China to the northern Afghan city of Hairatan, offers Afghan exporters an alternative route to Asia with dramatically reduced transit times.

    Another area of potential cooperation is Pakistan, where China and the US want Pakistan to grow its economy and undermine extremism.

    China’s US$51 billion commitment to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor is designed to build highways, railways and energy generation in Pakistan, including a proposed rail link and highway between Pakistan’s port at Gwadar and China’s north-western region of Xinjiang, which would also connect the Obor to China’s Maritime Silk Road project.

    Pakistanis hope the corridor will create 700,000 jobs by 2030 for some of Pakistan’s 190 million people, a majority of whom are under the age of 22.

    Washington and Beijing are already working together in Pakistan on the clean-energy project Sapphire Wind.

    The US Overseas Private Investment Corporation has provided US$128 million for this 50MW wind project, which uses General Electric turbines.

    Under the umbrella of the US-Pakistan Clean Energy Partnership, the US will invest US$70 million on transmission lines to connect a 680MW wind project in Sindh to the national grid. China is also an investor.

    Collaborative NSR-Obor efforts between the US and China can benefit US companies. The Wall Street Journal reported in October that General Electric, Honeywell and Caterpillar are already focused on the possibilities. According to the Journal, GE’s orders in Pakistan are more than US$1 billion today, compared with less than US$100 million five years ago.

    Connecting US firms to Obor and keeping them aware of NSR opportunities require a concerted effort by the US government, including the Departments of State and Commerce, the US Overseas Private Investment Corporation and the Export Import Bank.

     

    POTENTIAL CHALLENGES

    Despite the obvious benefits, there are many challenges to creating an NSR-Obor nexus. China may be pursuing Obor to control rising wage rates at home by exporting employment and soaking up overproduction in industries like steel.

    The Chinese might decide to go it alone, with the enormous resources they have promised against a small US investment in NSR. The number of American firms interested in Obor may be too small to reach critical mass and those that seek engagement may stand no real chance to work with Chinese companies, especially state-owned enterprises.

    In September, representatives of 10 Chinese state-owned enterprises visited Washington and New York to promote US commercial interest in Obor opportunities, but more needs to be done by Beijing to welcome US private-sector participation and protect US commercial interests.

    Another challenge is managing Indian anxieties about Obor. Many analysts in Delhi see Obor not as a development initiative, but as a strategic effort by Beijing to surround India with naval facilities in Gwadar in Pakistan, Colombo in Sri Lanka and Kyaukpyu in Myanmar.

    The possibilities of joint efforts inspired by Obor and NSR present the incoming Trump administration with a strategic opportunity to improve US-China ties, advance common security interests and create economic opportunities for American business.

    Success would bring tangible benefits to a region where further state failure would surely fuel extremism, a threat to both the US and China.

    And, not least, there would be something positive on President-elect Trump’s already contentious agenda with China when he takes office in January.

    Ambassador Marc Grossman is a Vice Chairman of The Cohen Group. A US Foreign Service Officer for 29 years, he was the US Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan (2011-2012) and a Kissinger Senior Fellow at Yale in 2013. This article was first published in Yale Global Online.

  • China’s new Silk Road leads west to Middle East

    Biennials in country’s Muslim-majority regions coincide with cultural exchange with Qatar

    by LISA MOVIUS

    16f7e2b34d23701cd67fd7b95b82ee1c_1c7c0f42e9d56c5b0e55638c0490b4492000x1332_quality99_o_1b032f2kg15r41ab81t7onopm8nas.jpg

    China is increasingly engaging with countries with mainly Muslim populations through cultural exchanges as its government champions the creation of a new, economic “Silk Road”. Two biennials opened this autumn in the country’s far-flung western regions, which are the respective homelands of China’s two largest Muslim minorities, the Turkic Uyghurs and the more assimilated Hui. Meanwhile, the 11th Shanghai Biennale, which is due to open on 11 November (until 12 March 2017), features an unprecedented number of international artists from Muslim countries, even though China’s own Muslim minorities remain marginalised.

     

    The third Xinjiang International Art Biennale was organised by the ministry of culture of the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region in Urumqi (8-31 October). Featuring folk and popular art, which reflect official preferences, it contrasts starkly with the global contemporary approach of the first Yinchuan Biennale (until 18 December) at the new, private MoCA Yinchuan, in the capital of the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region.

     

    Urumqi and Yinchuan are stops on China’s ancient Silk Road, the overland trade route that led to the mostly Muslim countries to China’s west. Their biennials coincide with an increase in China’s cultural engagement with neighbouring countries and the Middle East. For example, Doha’s Museum of Islamic Art is currently showing Treasures of China (until 7 January), including terracotta warriors from Xi’an—the start of the Silk Road—as part of the official Qatar-China Year.

     

    The cultural exchange with Qatar is part of China’s massive One Belt, One Road Initiative, championed by president Xi Jinping as a way to counteract slowing domestic growth. The Chinese government aims to develop new markets to China’s west and south.

     

    Official cultural exchanges under One Belt, One Road’s auspices now abound, such as a thematic section of the 18th China Shanghai International Arts Festival (until November 15), featuring projects from Qatar and Egypt. Unofficially, such events may encourage institutions in coastal China to show more work by contemporary artists from Muslim-majority countries. However, there are no indicators that state scrutiny of unofficial shows will relax. Other Gallery Shanghai’s March 2011 group exhibition The Third Eye, which featured works by nine Iranian artists, was closed after the Iranian consulate complained to the Chinese authorities about its content.

     

    Religious and political taboos

    In the past two decades artists from across Asia, the Middle East and North Africa have rarely been shown in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou, partly because politics and religion, major themes in contemporary art from these regions, are major taboos in China. Meanwhile, negative stereotypes of the Hui, Uyghurs and foreign Muslims remain common among Han Chinese. “It is impossible to attract publicity and visitors without famous artists’ works in a show. Chinese art museums are still early in their evolution, and well-known Islamic artists are very few,” says MoCA Yinchuan director Liu Wenjin. “I will not use Islamic identity to promote artists­—their background is incidental to whether their art can move the audience.” She blames Chinese audiences’ hesitancy towards art from the Islamic world on sensationalist media reports.

     

    While Chinese institutions and collectors are often uninterested in, or wary of, contemporary art from countries with mainly Muslim populations, the Shanghai Biennale will feature work by artists including Beiruit-based, Iraqi-American Rheim Alkadhi and Indonesia’s Agan Harahap. The show, which is organised by Raqs Media Collective, founded by three New Delhi-based artists, stresses “south-south co-operation”.

  • China’s new Silk Road leads west to Middle East

    Biennials in country’s Muslim-majority regions coincide with cultural exchange with Qatar

    by LISA MOVIUS

    16f7e2b34d23701cd67fd7b95b82ee1c_1c7c0f42e9d56c5b0e55638c0490b4492000x1332_quality99_o_1b032f2kg15r41ab81t7onopm8nas.jpg

    China is increasingly engaging with countries with mainly Muslim populations through cultural exchanges as its government champions the creation of a new, economic “Silk Road”. Two biennials opened this autumn in the country’s far-flung western regions, which are the respective homelands of China’s two largest Muslim minorities, the Turkic Uyghurs and the more assimilated Hui. Meanwhile, the 11th Shanghai Biennale, which is due to open on 11 November (until 12 March 2017), features an unprecedented number of international artists from Muslim countries, even though China’s own Muslim minorities remain marginalised.

     

    The third Xinjiang International Art Biennale was organised by the ministry of culture of the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region in Urumqi (8-31 October). Featuring folk and popular art, which reflect official preferences, it contrasts starkly with the global contemporary approach of the first Yinchuan Biennale (until 18 December) at the new, private MoCA Yinchuan, in the capital of the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region.

     

    Urumqi and Yinchuan are stops on China’s ancient Silk Road, the overland trade route that led to the mostly Muslim countries to China’s west. Their biennials coincide with an increase in China’s cultural engagement with neighbouring countries and the Middle East. For example, Doha’s Museum of Islamic Art is currently showing Treasures of China (until 7 January), including terracotta warriors from Xi’an—the start of the Silk Road—as part of the official Qatar-China Year.

     

    The cultural exchange with Qatar is part of China’s massive One Belt, One Road Initiative, championed by president Xi Jinping as a way to counteract slowing domestic growth. The Chinese government aims to develop new markets to China’s west and south.

     

    Official cultural exchanges under One Belt, One Road’s auspices now abound, such as a thematic section of the 18th China Shanghai International Arts Festival (until November 15), featuring projects from Qatar and Egypt. Unofficially, such events may encourage institutions in coastal China to show more work by contemporary artists from Muslim-majority countries. However, there are no indicators that state scrutiny of unofficial shows will relax. Other Gallery Shanghai’s March 2011 group exhibition The Third Eye, which featured works by nine Iranian artists, was closed after the Iranian consulate complained to the Chinese authorities about its content.

     

    Religious and political taboos

    In the past two decades artists from across Asia, the Middle East and North Africa have rarely been shown in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou, partly because politics and religion, major themes in contemporary art from these regions, are major taboos in China. Meanwhile, negative stereotypes of the Hui, Uyghurs and foreign Muslims remain common among Han Chinese. “It is impossible to attract publicity and visitors without famous artists’ works in a show. Chinese art museums are still early in their evolution, and well-known Islamic artists are very few,” says MoCA Yinchuan director Liu Wenjin. “I will not use Islamic identity to promote artists­—their background is incidental to whether their art can move the audience.” She blames Chinese audiences’ hesitancy towards art from the Islamic world on sensationalist media reports.

     

    While Chinese institutions and collectors are often uninterested in, or wary of, contemporary art from countries with mainly Muslim populations, the Shanghai Biennale will feature work by artists including Beiruit-based, Iraqi-American Rheim Alkadhi and Indonesia’s Agan Harahap. The show, which is organised by Raqs Media Collective, founded by three New Delhi-based artists, stresses “south-south co-operation”.